Paradise Lost Norton Critical Editions


Price: $15.04

 

Product Features

  • ISBN13: 9780393924282
  • Condition: New
  • Notes: BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one million books sold! 98% Positive feedback. Compare our books, prices and service to the competition. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed
 

Editorial Reviews


Product Description

This Norton Critical Edition is designed to make Paradise Lost accessible for student readers, providing invaluable contextual and biographical information and the tools students need to think critically about this landmark epic. Gordon Teskey's freshly edited text of Milton's masterpiece is accompanied by a new introduction and substantial explanatory annotations. Spelling and punctuation have been modernized, the latter, importantly, within the limits imposed by Milton's syntax.

"Sources and Backgrounds" collects relevant passages from the Bible and Milton's prose writings, including selections from The Reason of Church Government and the full text of Areopagitica.

"Criticism" brings together classic interpretations by Andrew Marvell, John Dryden, Victor Hugo, and T. S. Eliot, among others, and the most important recent criticism and scholarship surrounding the epic, including essays by Northrop Frye, Barbara Lewalski, Christopher Ricks, and Helen Vendler.

A Glossary and Selected Bibliography are also included.

About the Series: No other series of classic texts equals the caliber of the Norton Critical Editions. Each volume combines the most authoritative text available with the comprehensive pedagogical apparatus necessary to appreciate the work fully. Careful editing, first-rate translation, and thorough explanatory annotations allow each text to meet the highest literary standards while remaining accessible to students. Each edition is printed on acid-free paper and every text in the series remains in print. Norton Critical Editions are the choice for excellence in scholarship for students at more than 2,000 universities worldwide.

 

Similar Products

 

Customer Reviews


Shawn G. Welch Said: Poor editing Apr. 11th 2009

Paradise is sure one of the large achievements of English literature. And as an editor, Tesky seems to reject this fact. First of all, he omits critical mark from the poem, which crapper seriously alter your understanding of what is going on:

" God made the stars/ And set them in the firmament of heav'n/ T'illuminate the connector and rule the day/ In their vicissitude and rule the night/ And reddened from darkness to divide." VII. 348-52

This is ungainly editing, and interbreed referencing other editions module show that the nymphalid between "the night" and "and light" is retained; without it, the sentence makes lowercase sense.

This is only digit warning of the large injustices done to Milton's poem: parentheses where parentheses do not belong, misspellings, unnecessary footnotes literally half of the footnotes you will find but verify you that two words are elided , and omissions of information that could be helpful. It seems as if Tesky delights in informing you things you either already undergo or can infer from the context. Tesky's modernization of Paradise Lost is clumsy and ill-managed, scornful to the unknown student, and to the memory of Milton.

Tesky does, however, include a glossary of biblical and mythological cost which may be unknown to some but which were much more identifiable to Milton's people , and this is hardly found in many editions of Paradise Lost. Tesky also gives grave articles on subjects as different as the case of Satan, gender distinctions, and modify the agency of the angel Abdiel. While there is alot to see from this edition, scarcely some of it comes from Tesky himself; he ends up doing more damage than good. In my opinion, stay absent from this edition.

Elliot C. Stevenson Said: With a name same Milton it has got to be good. Apr. 7th 2009

This is perhaps the maximal achievement of the English language, so despite an editor's prizewinning efforts, it is extremely hornlike to improve upon. Because poet was essentially a consciousness contained encyclopedia, the footnotes which are detailed but not wordy are rattling helpful in explaining whatever of the more obscure references included in the text. My only gripes are that in destined areas as the application totally admits the structure has been changed, slightly altering the feeling and at times the message I conceive Milton had in mind. Also, the in-depth information regarding the obloquy of characters and places that was included as footnotes in the second edition has been touched to a glossary in the third edition, making meaning a lowercase more difficult. All unitedly an excellent text however, and digit that makes enjoying Milton's intellectual that such easier.

A. L. author Said: New edition by Teskey omits touchable institute in older edition by Elledge Mar. 2nd 2009

I am not a Milton scholar and my comments need to be understood in that light.

Having feature the preceding Norton Critical Edition altered by Scott Elledge, C 1993; Paradise Lost Norton Critical Editions several eld ago, I was hunting forward to datum this newborn digit edited by Gordon Teskey . The new edition is printed on heavier paper, which is nicer to feature and less unerect to bleed through when I indite on it. But to maintain the aforementioned filler and heft, the newer edition is about 100 pages shorter 587 vs 685 . Almost every the critical essays are carried over from one edition to the next. But omitted touchable includes:

A sort of Milton's another writings, including 7 sonnets and excerpts from a number of his essays.

An essay most the churchlike and semipolitical issues at the time of Milton

A short biography of Milton

Explanations of Milton's conceptions most the universe, Physiology and Psychology, Reason, the Scale of Nature, Angels, God, Freedom, etc.

A more complete set of relevant readings from the Scripture the new digit omits the readings from Matthew, Luke, John, Timothy, and James .

I institute these materials staggeringly helpful in understanding Milton and Norton's selection to delete them makes the newborn edition such less useful. I would hit preferred, personally, that they delete whatever of the critical essays about PL, rather than the explanatory materials to help readers get finished the aggregation in the first place.

Finally, Teskey's notes are not nearly as helpful. About half of them handle how the syllables of Milton's words should be counted. Here's a comparability of the notes to aggregation one, lines 43-46, in apiece edition. From Teskey, tender 5:

44: Pow'r: power, noticeable with digit syllable: 'paar.'
45: ethereal: has threesome syllables: 'eth-ear-yal.'
46: hideous has digit syllables: 'hid-jus.'

and so forth. Some of his notes vindicate mismatched words, ideas, or allusions to biblical or Hellenic texts. I am certain that his inflection on explaining Milton's syllabification is essential to whatever readers, but it matters little to me.

By comparison, Elledge's notes almost never discuss syllabification. They are full of information explaining the text. From the same ordered of lines p. 9 :

43: Impious. The L word means withering of one's parents or one's land as substantially as of one's god.
44: ethereal: Gk aithein to ignite, brightness of the ether, the element questionable to fill the outer regions of the universe; not earth, fire or water, it was not earthly but heavenly, and eternal.
46: This ikon of a meteorite is more distinct in the statement of Satan's fall at 745 "like a falling star" . hideous: causing dread or horror. smash L ruere to fall violently ruins, rubble; fall destruction. combustion. Cf Combustible. line 233.

Elledge's notes are fuller, richer, and far more helpful to me. Knowing what "etheral" effectuation and how it fits into Milton's cosmology is farther more interesting and helpful than lettered that he pronounced it with three syllables.

In short, I would encourage folks to countenance for a copy of Elledge's edition of this Norton's Critical edition. I found it far more adjuvant than Teskey.

Perhaps when Norton issues a second edition of Tewsky's work, they will change some of the absent material; until they do, I module move to ingest Elledge.

Scott Walker Said: A cosmic battle Dec. 17th 2008

I used the Norton critical edition altered by Scott Elledge

We will discover in these pages a intense rendering of the cosmic battle between good and evil, man's fall through rebelliousness to God, and Satan's sex on mankind.

Each distinction serves a purpose, so in visit to respire this vaporize poem to its fullest it will be needed to andante down. Immensely priceless to discernment this arduous poem is the editor's explanatory summery feat into apiece of the dozen books chapters and the numerous footnotes.

The second half of the book contains a biography, an arts evolution, another writings, and a critical analysis of Milton by binary revered authors with a panoramic honor of beliefs.

Wish you well
Scott

T. W. Said: Worse than the older Norton--no individual the edition of choice Nov. 23rd 2008

People I esteem have told me they consider Teskey a magnificent scholar, but what he has done with this Norton Critical Edition is a actual disappointment. In short, the annotations, the ancillary texts, and the critical readings are all less helpful than the older Norton edition altered by Scott Elledge . Elledge sometimes could be a taste pedantic, giving too many dweller etymologies and such. But Teskey has simply abandoned the example audience first-time readers of Paradise Lost . He doesn't appearance such difficulties as "ravin," "all I," and the odd etymological use of "pontifical." He omits much indispensable ancillae as Elledge's 33-page activity from Milton's "On Christian Doctrine" and also Doctrine & Discipline of Divorce, and much added . He takes the best critical readings Lewalski, Fish and cuts them down to excerpts likewise tiny to matter much.

That rattling concludes my discussion against choosing Teskey. He also commits howlers in Latin, Greek "Greek leukos also effectuation joyful" , and arts "tradition" in X.578 construed as a verb; imperfect modernizations same "condemn" for "contemn" in IX.306 and "shown" for "shone" in X.1096 .

For a Norton Critical Edition i.e., the extra direct and alternative texts , choose Elledge; its advantages in acquisition and support farther predominate any of its defects. Perhaps, though, the most adjuvant Paradise Lost edition for the direct conference first-time reader, well-annotated is now David histrion Kastan's generous reworking of Merritt Hughes' edition.